New Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Degree and you may attitudes measure having heterosexuals (LGB-KASH; Worthington et al

The decide to try provided 154 heterosexual undergraduate pupils in the mindset (136 women and you can 18 men) who have been browsing Russian social and personal colleges. Decades varied from 17 so you’re able to 51, that have a suggest period of 30.3. Seventy-half a dozen respondents was indeed off Moscow (people several.4 mil), and you will 78 have been of a tiny town throughout the Southern out-of Russia, Volgodonsk about Rostov part, which includes around 170,000 citizens.

The research tool all of the underwent as well as send translation, and you may was applied in identical buy to all or any people. Players shown the agree because of the participating in the research, no pinpointing information is built-up. Undergraduate youngsters within the social research courses in 2 colleges was in fact desired to sign up the analysis.

An example goods in the Hate subscale comes with: “GLB individuals have earned new hatred it located,” and on the GLB Civil-rights Г‡in kadД±n hakkД±nda gerГ§ekler subscale: “I do believe age-sex partners

, 2005). This size is actually an effective twenty eight-product questionnaire, for the self-declaration mode, hence steps four products one to determine a person’s attitudes otherwise degree regarding GLB anybody: dislike (6 points), degree (5 circumstances), religious dispute (seven activities), GLB Civil-rights (5 items), and you may Internalized Affirma-tiveness (5 items). What exactly was basically mentioned on an excellent 5-part Likert-type of size (between “1-Really trait of me personally” to “5-Extremely uncharacteristic from me personally”). The newest

an incredible number of for every subscale had been extra to one another which will make an element measure. For this test, only the subscales Dislike (opposite coded) (Cronbach leader = .83) and you can GLB Civil rights (Cronbach alpha = .71) was in fact within the study. “

The fresh NEo Five Grounds Index (NEO-FFI; Costa & McRae, 1992). This sixty-goods tool try an abbreviated types of brand new 24-item NEO-PI-Roentgen, and this tips five personality size (neuroticism, extraversion, visibility, agreeable-ness, and you will conscientiousness), that have 12 situations incorporated for each and every domain name. The NEO-FFI have mind-descriptive comments you to definitely players speed with the a 5-area Likert kind of size (anywhere between step 1 = highly disagree so you’re able to 5 = strongly concur). A sample product regarding neuroticism scale has: “Whenever I’m less than many be concerned, often Personally i think like I will parts,” and you may regarding the conscientiousness size: “You will find a very clear number of specifications and really works on them in an organized fashion.” Internal surface viewpoints for everyone scales varied off .74 so you’re able to .89.

social get in touch with Questions. Two interpersonal contact inquiries explored no matter if participants got intimate friends, friends, otherwise acquaintances have been gay or lesbian.

This new answers have been shared to make a variable proving people who have no nearest and dearest, family members, or acquaintances, and people which have matchmaking with GLB someone

With respect to Suggest Attitudes, the fresh model (see Dining table 2) are tall: F (7, 131) = ; R2 = .498; p = .001. The latest respondent’s region generated a critical independent contribution from the put of record parameters (fi = .616; p = .001), that have

the brand new smaller urban setting regarding Volgodonsk area predicting deeper Suggest Thinking. With regards to the step two, social contact with GLB anyone made a hefty incremental contribution to Dislike (AR2 = .05; p = .001), showing that a whole lot more interpersonal contact a guy got that have personal family relations, relatives, and colleagues who were GLB, the brand new less Hate it recommended (fi = -.248; p = .001). With regards to character affairs, one another neuroticism (fi = .238; p = .001) and you will conscientiousness (fi = .195; p = .009) was indeed predictive regarding Hateful Thinking (AR2 = .06; p = .001); most other identity items didn’t predict suggest thinking.

The fresh new model examining predictors away from viewpoints off GLB Civil-rights (discover Table step 3) was also significant: F (seven, 131) = seven.205; R2 = .28; p = .001. When it comes to background parameters, one another women gender (base = -.299; p = .001) and you may Moscow region (base = -.422; p = .001) individually and you may definitely predicted deeper acceptance regarding GLB Rights. But not, social contact failed to notably sign up for new variance significantly more than and you can not in the record parameters (AR2 = .04; p = .297). In the long run, the addition of the newest personality affairs don’t subscribe to new design, no matter if neuroticism approached significance (legs = -.162; p = .061), suggesting there is a relationship ranging from neuroticism and run out of out of support to possess GLB Liberties.